<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: But that Disqualifies ME!!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.polyamorousmisanthrope.com/2008/06/23/but-that-disqualifies-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.polyamorousmisanthrope.com/2008/06/23/but-that-disqualifies-me/</link>
	<description>Wielding the Stick of Grandmotherly Kindness</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 04:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Goddess of Java</title>
		<link>http://www.polyamorousmisanthrope.com/2008/06/23/but-that-disqualifies-me/#comment-6487</link>
		<dc:creator>Goddess of Java</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 17:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyamorousmisanthrope.com/?p=118#comment-6487</guid>
		<description>Tim, there's a HUGE difference between "X subgroup of humanity isn't attractive" and "X subgroup of humanity isn't attractive &lt;i&gt;to me&lt;/i&gt;."

The first implies there's some sort of moral absolute about personal taste.  The second says that, yep, you've got a personal taste.

As a member of a subgroup of humanity that plenty of people DONT find sexually attractive (I'm fat), I feel for you.  But I think people are allowed their tastes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, there&#8217;s a HUGE difference between &#8220;X subgroup of humanity isn&#8217;t attractive&#8221; and &#8220;X subgroup of humanity isn&#8217;t attractive <i>to me</i>.&#8221;</p>
<p>The first implies there&#8217;s some sort of moral absolute about personal taste.  The second says that, yep, you&#8217;ve got a personal taste.</p>
<p>As a member of a subgroup of humanity that plenty of people DONT find sexually attractive (I&#8217;m fat), I feel for you.  But I think people are allowed their tastes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.polyamorousmisanthrope.com/2008/06/23/but-that-disqualifies-me/#comment-6416</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 04:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyamorousmisanthrope.com/?p=118#comment-6416</guid>
		<description>I try not to take it personally when I hear that Asian men aren't attractive, but as one, it gets under my (yellow) skin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I try not to take it personally when I hear that Asian men aren&#8217;t attractive, but as one, it gets under my (yellow) skin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristy</title>
		<link>http://www.polyamorousmisanthrope.com/2008/06/23/but-that-disqualifies-me/#comment-5402</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyamorousmisanthrope.com/?p=118#comment-5402</guid>
		<description>I think you nailed it again. Sometimes it's a very good thing if everyone doesn't find you attractive, it only becomes an issue if no one does, then maybe a redo is in order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you nailed it again. Sometimes it&#8217;s a very good thing if everyone doesn&#8217;t find you attractive, it only becomes an issue if no one does, then maybe a redo is in order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mib</title>
		<link>http://www.polyamorousmisanthrope.com/2008/06/23/but-that-disqualifies-me/#comment-5401</link>
		<dc:creator>mib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 08:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyamorousmisanthrope.com/?p=118#comment-5401</guid>
		<description>Speaking as a member of a LDR who happens to be visiting said person... they can work. And our spouses are reminding us that we promised to go shopping for new clothes. So it can happen. But otherwise, I fall into the "LDRs don't work for me" crowd. They never really have, until now, but I've learned my lessons along the way, and it's possible that that is helping us now. (And yes, I agree with the local choice/global statement issue as framed by Ashbet!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking as a member of a LDR who happens to be visiting said person&#8230; they can work. And our spouses are reminding us that we promised to go shopping for new clothes. So it can happen. But otherwise, I fall into the &#8220;LDRs don&#8217;t work for me&#8221; crowd. They never really have, until now, but I&#8217;ve learned my lessons along the way, and it&#8217;s possible that that is helping us now. (And yes, I agree with the local choice/global statement issue as framed by Ashbet!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freya</title>
		<link>http://www.polyamorousmisanthrope.com/2008/06/23/but-that-disqualifies-me/#comment-5399</link>
		<dc:creator>Freya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 01:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyamorousmisanthrope.com/?p=118#comment-5399</guid>
		<description>What Ashbet said :D

I personally don't like LDRs because I don't have a history of doing them well. BUT provided said partner is able to deal with the occasional faux pas and we work on communicating, I'm slowly finding that poly LDRs aren't that scary/bad - kinda in one now, which is working. Mono LDRs are significantly different, I need my snuggling regularly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Ashbet said <img src='http://www.polyamorousmisanthrope.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I personally don&#8217;t like LDRs because I don&#8217;t have a history of doing them well. BUT provided said partner is able to deal with the occasional faux pas and we work on communicating, I&#8217;m slowly finding that poly LDRs aren&#8217;t that scary/bad - kinda in one now, which is working. Mono LDRs are significantly different, I need my snuggling regularly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashbet</title>
		<link>http://www.polyamorousmisanthrope.com/2008/06/23/but-that-disqualifies-me/#comment-5396</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashbet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polyamorousmisanthrope.com/?p=118#comment-5396</guid>
		<description>Honestly, it depends on how it's stated.  If someone says "I'm not attracted to larger women," I have no problem with it.   If someone says "Larger women are not attractive," I tend to bristle and retort.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and what they find attractive (for example, I don't find very muscular guys attractive, I like either a little skinniness or a larger frame.)  I don't think that whether or not *I* am attracted to a person is an objective statement of whether they *are* attractive.

People making generalizations (like "LDRs never work") are going to get a negative response from me, whereas people saying "LDRs haven't worked for me" won't.

It's not a contest to see how many people can be attracted to you, you're right.  And it's not a personal failing if Person X isn't attracted to you (although it kind of sucks if you happen to be attracted to Person X!)  If everyone had the same "type," most of the population would be excluded from the dating pool . . . whereas it's awesome to know that while I'm not to some people's taste, others find me and women like me to be very attractive.  And, really, *they're* the ones I care about in the end!

-- A :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, it depends on how it&#8217;s stated.  If someone says &#8220;I&#8217;m not attracted to larger women,&#8221; I have no problem with it.   If someone says &#8220;Larger women are not attractive,&#8221; I tend to bristle and retort.</p>
<p>Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and what they find attractive (for example, I don&#8217;t find very muscular guys attractive, I like either a little skinniness or a larger frame.)  I don&#8217;t think that whether or not *I* am attracted to a person is an objective statement of whether they *are* attractive.</p>
<p>People making generalizations (like &#8220;LDRs never work&#8221;) are going to get a negative response from me, whereas people saying &#8220;LDRs haven&#8217;t worked for me&#8221; won&#8217;t.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a contest to see how many people can be attracted to you, you&#8217;re right.  And it&#8217;s not a personal failing if Person X isn&#8217;t attracted to you (although it kind of sucks if you happen to be attracted to Person X!)  If everyone had the same &#8220;type,&#8221; most of the population would be excluded from the dating pool . . . whereas it&#8217;s awesome to know that while I&#8217;m not to some people&#8217;s taste, others find me and women like me to be very attractive.  And, really, *they&#8217;re* the ones I care about in the end!</p>
<p>&#8211; A <img src='http://www.polyamorousmisanthrope.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
